ESPN’s Dave McMenamin has reported that “multiple sources around the league suggested to ESPN that recently retired Chris Paul could have a role” in the Los Angeles Lakers front office. That is the whole of it — sourced speculation, with no confirmation from the club, from Paul, or from incoming owners Bob Iger and Josh Kushner.

Ordinarily that would be a small item. It is not, because of what happened the last time Chris Paul was about to become a Laker.

8 December 2011

The Lakers, the New Orleans Hornets and the Houston Rockets agreed a three-team trade. Los Angeles would send out Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom. In return they would get a 26-year-old Chris Paul, to play alongside Kobe Bryant.

The deal was agreed. It did not happen. Commissioner David Stern blocked it, and the reason given was “basketball reasons”.

The detail that makes it extraordinary rather than merely controversial: the league itself owned the Hornets at the time. New Orleans was in league hands pending a sale, which meant the commissioner was simultaneously the seller and the referee. Reporting since has described pressure from other owners, including Cleveland’s Dan Gilbert and Dallas’s Mark Cuban, and a view within the league office that the return package would leave New Orleans stuck in mediocrity and harder to sell.

Paul signed with the Clippers a week later. He spent the next fifteen years playing in Los Angeles for the other team, and then in Houston, Oklahoma City, Phoenix, Golden State, San Antonio and finally Toronto.

It remains the only vetoed trade in NBA history.

What is actually being reported now

SourceDave McMenamin, ESPN
Wording“Multiple sources around the league suggested… could have a role”
Type of roleFront office — not playing, not coaching
Confirmed byNobody
Stated reasonsRelationship with Bob Iger; staying in LA near his children; friendship with JJ Redick

Note how little of that is basketball. The reported logic is a man who has finished playing, wants to live where his family lives, and knows the people running the building. That is how front-office hires usually happen, and it is worth saying plainly because the 2011 story invites a tidier narrative than the facts support.

The thing not to over-read

This is not a redemption arc and nobody has framed it as one. The commissioner who blocked the 2011 trade died in 2020. The ownership being cited — Iger and Kushner — is incoming, not the ownership that was thwarted then. The Hornets are long since sold and renamed. Almost none of the people involved in the veto are involved in this.

What is true is narrower and still interesting: the league office once decided Chris Paul could not join the Lakers, and now the only thing between him and a desk there appears to be whether somebody offers him one.

What would make it real

  1. A title. Front-office speculation stays speculation until there is a job named — adviser, executive, part-owner are all very different things.
  2. A word from Paul. He has been consistently willing to talk about his own plans; his silence so far is itself information.
  3. The ownership transition completing. An incoming owner does not usually hire before the paperwork does.

Until then: he has retired, he is being talked about, and fifteen years ago the league stopped him walking through the same door.

The current report and its wording — that multiple sources around the league suggested to ESPN that Chris Paul could have a role in the Lakers front office — is attributed to Dave McMenamin of ESPN and was relayed by Sports Illustrated on 14 August 2026. No confirmation had been issued by the Lakers, by Paul or by incoming owners Bob Iger and Josh Kushner at the time of writing, and no role, title or timeline has been reported. The 2011 details — the 8 December three-team agreement involving the Lakers, Hornets and Rockets, Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom going out, David Stern’s veto and the “basketball reasons” explanation, the league’s ownership of the Hornets, the reported objections from Dan Gilbert and Mark Cuban, and Paul signing with the Clippers a week later — are drawn from contemporaneous and subsequent reporting by ESPN, CBS Sports, NBC Sports and Sports Illustrated.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Has Chris Paul joined the Lakers front office?

No. ESPN’s Dave McMenamin reported that multiple sources around the league suggested he could have a role. Neither the Lakers, nor Paul, nor the incoming ownership has confirmed anything.

Has Chris Paul retired?

Yes. He ended his playing career after being traded to the Toronto Raptors in February.

Why was Chris Paul’s trade to the Lakers vetoed in 2011?

On 8 December 2011 the Lakers, New Orleans Hornets and Houston Rockets agreed a three-team deal. Commissioner David Stern blocked it, citing "basketball reasons". The league itself owned the Hornets at the time, and reporting since has described pressure from other owners, including Dan Gilbert and Mark Cuban.

Has any other NBA trade been vetoed?

No. That 2011 deal remains the only vetoed trade in NBA history.

What would the Lakers have given up in 2011?

Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom, in a deal that would have paired the then 26-year-old Paul with Kobe Bryant.

Why is he being linked to the Lakers now?

The reported reasons are personal and situational rather than basketball: a close relationship with incoming owner Bob Iger, a wish to stay in Los Angeles near his children, and a friendship with head coach JJ Redick.